Sunday, August 30, 2020

Appeasing the Foolish & Rebellious Wife

I am thankful my ex-wife never gave me an ultimatum of either submitting to her headship or her filing a divorce. She probably would not had said it in those kinds of words, but the intent would still be there. It would probably start with "little" things, and as she sees that I have lost my backbone, will slowly creep in to take over the rest of the leadership in the household.

I think my ex-wife understood my nature. Of course, I would bend the knee. . . initially. . .  but after a certain amount of time came about, and me realizing just how much her foolish decisions were forcing me to clean-up after her and sacrifice the bottom line, I would had revolted and assumed my position as head of household. By then, I'd probably made the decision that I would prefer her divorcing me rather than have myself and my children be lead by her incompetent leadership.

If my ex-wife was competent, and usually made the correct decisions, I wouldn't had minded deferring to her judgment. It's called "delegation." As long as everyone understood that I would be ultimately responsible (and have the final say), I don't mind trying out someone else's idea when it is better than mine. I would probably be quite relieved there was someone competent I could bounce my ideas off of.

Instead, my ex-wife is a walking time-bomb of bad ideas. If you were to take a record of all the ideas she had that were contrary to mine, you would probably see about a 95% rate of me ultimately being correct. My ability to strategize and predict future events were God-like compared to her inability to see past her own fears that kept her paralyzed from taking any action.

Why was I so unyielding to her foolishness?

  1. Incompetent leadership pisses me off, especially if I have to bear the consequences.
  2. I would bear the consequences of all her incompetent decisions because I was the sole income earner.
  3. I would be the one judged, not her, for the direction of the family by my adult children (when they grow up enough to understand).
  4. She is completely illiterate in the dialectic, doesn't know what the scientific method is, and is incapable of basic reasoning.
  5. I would be held accountable by God "...because you have listened to the voice of your wife." When the reasoning of her decisions, and with her track record of being consistently wrong, how could I ever use the excuse, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.” ?

There were some pivotal disagreements we had that I could had easily succumbed to her foolish thinking. The best it would had provided me was perhaps a couple more years of torturous marriage with her. That's hardly a reward for appeasement. 

One major area of contention was moving to Puerto Rico from the paradise of Orange County, California. I could had bent the knee and never made the move because of her fear. From that decision alone, the monetary tax savings we made more than makes up for the asset rape that is still pending. At the very worst, they balance out.

Never appease a rebellious wife when she's just X number of arguments away from filing divorce.

I'm so glad I never did. It would've only prolonged the marriage, and I would had been in a worse off economic position had she waited until I made additional income.

As it was with the kids, my only preference would had been that she divorced me earlier.

Plus, it's likely that the long quarantine in Coronavirus would had finished us off, as we're seeing worldwide. And the worst part? Divorce courts are closed!

Why have so many kids in a bad marriage?

Q: If I knew divorce was going to occur after 12 years of marriage, would I still had chosen to have children with my ex-wife?

or

Q: If you knew your marriage was so bad, why did you keep having more children?

One answer would be that even during that entire time of difficulty, I never presumed that my wife would file to divorce me.

I think in likelihood, it just didn't come to mind. I was married. I had money. She was ok having more children, and so was I. So why not?

(Because we would get divorced one day?) I don't think either one of us thought that.

Also, her biological clock was ticking. She was more than four years older than me when we got married.

An alternative way to think of it is to imagine a situation where we chose to not have children. Let's say, we decided to stop after the first child on the basis that we were unhappy with each other.

Let's say, that because of the lowered stress of raising just one child versus the four we had, we ended up staying married without divorce. The potential combinations are quite a bit.

One could argue that eventually my ex-wife would had become "woke", regardless of the number of children, and discovered that her Biblical "submission" to me, was in fact, Domestic Abuse.

Let's try some various outcomes.


OUTCOME 1: One child, stopped because she was unhaaaaapy, and divorced after child moves out of house.

WINNER: 4 children, divorced, remarried to happier woman, and have more children.


OUTCOME 2: One child, stopped because she was unhaaaaapy, and stayed married to misery until death.

WINNER: 4 children, divorced, remarried to happier woman, and have more children.


You get the idea.

There is also the reality that you can never predict should the Holy Spirit change the rebellious and foolish wife's heart.

If my objective was to have more children (which I would've been fine with if the first wife wanted to keep going. Her biological clock was perhaps the greater hindrance), then my first wife divorcing me and freeing me up to have more children with a much younger wife was doing me a favor.

In fact, I would had been better off if she divorced me earlier so that I could begin having children with my new wife at a younger age.

I cannot say that my 12 years of unhappy marriage with my first wife was a waste because I have four children to show for it. Before I know it, they will be adults, working with me on my homestead and real estate investments. Because I had children at such a young age, I will still have so many more years (God willing) to have numerous active and fun adventures.

Being able to ski with my daughters is so much more fun and fulfilling than me skiing by myself or my other bachelor friends. By having so many children at a young(ish) age, I will have many more years of enjoyment with them to come.

In terms of children and the divorce, I would had preferred having more or her filing divorce earlier.

Now, I am speaking from a place where I have monetary resources to afford numerous divorces and child support payments. I do not know if I would be having the same positive thinking should I have to stop making more children due to economic concerns.

I think on the whole, however, that I still defer to Psalm 127:3-5, ESV and pretty much every "traditional" society before it has been overrun by "Boomer" selfishness:

Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord,
    the fruit of the womb a reward.

Like arrows in the hand of a warrior
    are the children of one's youth.

Blessed is the man
    who fills his quiver with them!

He shall not be put to shame
    when he speaks with his enemies in the gate.

This will be especially the case when my children are manning the ramparts on our homestead for 2033. You could say it's in my blood.



Operation Red Sea: The Chinese "Black Hawk Down"

It's been a long time since the great, Civic Nationalist, military movies have been released by Hellmouth. It's become "woke" to hate on the nation that was founded by a bunch of racists. To have pride in America would mean you are a Trump supporter and racist. I miss the days when I could declare out loud, "America! Fuck yeah!" from Independence Day.

In order to get my fix for unadulterated, modern, largish scale combat, I have to resort to the unapologetically Nationalist, Chinese.

This is very loosely based on the 2015 Chinese evacuation of people from Yemen.

The movie felt very much like a Call of Duty: Modern Warfare game. The sequence and pacing felt very much like different "levels."

Those familiar with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare games will not find any of the movie ideas unique. The fact that they went for it, never apologize, and gore it up makes this worth watching.

I will admit, the Chinese faces, same haircuts, and lack of facial hair made it difficult for character differentiation. Also, they are not steroid induced, muscular hulks which makes them all seem even more interchangeable. You can contrast what I'm referring to such as with a movie like, "The Expendables."

The Chinese destroy "America" in terms of propaganda pieces to foster citizen sentiment. If morale is one of the greatest determining factors for victory in war, the Chinese have already won.


Parental Alienation is Now Illegal In Puerto Rico

Just last month, July 19, 2020, the Puerto Rican government passed Law 70-2020 to explicitly call out parental alienation. The original, Spanish text can be found here. The full text of the law (as translated by Google Translate) is as follows.  

LAW

To amend Articles 7 and 9 of Law 223-2011, known as the "Law Protecting the Rights of Minors in the Custody Award Process", in order to contemplate the parental alienation in the custody determination; and for other related purposes.

STATEMENT OF MOTIVES

The family is the main protagonist in the upbringing and development of our minors. The family experience modulates and guides children through childhood and towards maturity, it is in the family where we can find explanations for the behavior and conduct of our minors. An adequate emotional and affective bond between parents and children translates into healthy family development for both. Unfortunately during the last decades we have seen changes in the family structure, this due to the increase in divorces or separations. 

After a divorce or separation, as the case may be, and once custody of the sons and / or daughters has been established, the State guarantees the right of both minors and parents to relate and maintain the appropriate family tie. In this way, a regime of visits to the non-custodial parent is established; They have important psychological functions for the development of childhood, in addition to safeguarding the emotional bond between the child and his parents. 

However, and even when the State guarantees the aforementioned right, there are occasions when one of the parties obstructs the filial relations of their sons and daughters with the other parent; in certain cases transforming the conscience of their children, through the use of different strategies, in order to prevent, obstruct or destroy their links with the other parent. 

This behavior, known as Parental Alienation, originates mainly in the context of disputes over the custody and care of children. The effects of parental alienation on minors and the alienated parent are considered a variant of emotional and psychological abuse, being one of the most subtle forms of child maltreatment, which in turn can produce permanent psychological damage in the bond with the parent ( a) alienated; as well as in the integral development of the minors involved. 

Although there is no pattern applicable to all cases, important factors have been identified that alert to its presence. That is why the judicial determination must not be sustained in legal statements without the presence of specialists in human behavior. In most jurisdictions it is seen as a problem to be addressed through civil and non-criminal channels. The criminal process can place you in the uncomfortable situation of testifying to penalize one of your parents. Apart from this, the complexity of the alienating behavior presents a challenge for criminal legislation. We understand that custody determination and its subsequent evaluation in family court must be the most appropriate mechanism to address these situations and provide remedies that tend to advance the emotional health of the minor and strengthen family relationships as much as possible. 

It is the public policy of the Government of Puerto Rico to ensure the best interest, protection, and comprehensive well-being of children and adolescents, and in the duty to ensure that well-being, reasonable opportunities and efforts must be provided to preserve family and community ties when it does not harm them. For this reason, this Legislative Assembly considers it necessary to update the definitions of this statute in order to continue effectively guaranteeing the well-being and protection of children on our island.

DETERMINED BY THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF PUERTO RICO:


Section 1.- A new subsection (13) is added, and the current subsection (13) is renumbered as subsection (14), in Article 7 of Law 223-2011, so that read as follows:

"Article 7.-Criteria to be considered in the custody award

When considering a custody application in which controversies arise between the parents regarding it, the court will refer the case to the Social Relations Unit Family, or the licensed professional that it deems necessary, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors or social workers, who will carry out an evaluation and will give a report with recommendations to the court. , as the court, when issuing its determination, will take into consideration the following criteria:

      ...

(13) It will analyze the presence of parental alienation, or any other reasons that may cause resistance cia of the minor to relate to his parents. Parental alienation refers to the obstruction by one of the parents of the filial relationships of their sons or daughters, minors, with the other parent, through the use of different strategies, with the purpose of transforming or indoctrinating the conscience. of their sons or daughters, in order to denigrate, prevent, obstruct or destroy their ties with the other parent and the minor presents thoughts or feelings of rejection towards the other parent; demonstrates negative attitudes towards this or if, in effect, the affective bond between the minor and the other parent has been affected. All actions arising from this subsection must occur repetitively so that they constitute a pattern and not based on isolated events. 

Parental alienation may be evidenced, without being understood as a limitation, in the following ways: 

(i) Refusing to pass the phone calls or trying to direct the content of such calls to the children. 

(ii) Organize activities with the children during the period that the other parent should normally exercise their right to visit or find ways to hinder the reunion between them. 

(iii) Intercept letters, messages or packages sent to the children. 

(iv) Devaluate and insult the other parent in front of the children.

(v) Refusing to inform the other parent, on purpose, of the activities in which the children are involved, such as school, family, social or other functions. 

(vi) Talk rudely about the new spouse of the other parent.

(vii) Prevent the other parent from exercising their visitation rights. 

(viii) Make important, non-emergency decisions about children without consulting the other parent.

(ix) Change (or try to change) their surnames or first names.

(x) Prevent the other parent from accessing the children's school and medical records.

(xi) Go on vacation without the children and leave them with another person, even if the other parent is available and voluntary to take care of them.


(xii) Discredit the clothes or gifts that the other parent has bought them, and prohibit them from wearing them. 

(xiii) Threatening children with punishment if they dare to call, write or contact the other parent.

(14) Any other valid or pertinent criteria that can be considered to guarantee the best welfare of the minor. ”

Section 2.- Article 9 of Law 223-2011 is amended to read as follows:

“Article 9.-When joint custody will not be considered as beneficial and favorable for the best interests of minors.

Joint custody will not be considered as beneficial and favorable to the best interests of minors in the following cases:

(1) ...

(2) ...

(3) ...

(4) ...

(5 ) ...

(6) ...

(7) ...

(8) ...

If, after granting joint custody, one of the parents, recklessly, arbitrarily and unfairly refuses to accept said decision, and performs acts to hinder the relationship of the other parent with the minors, the court may alter the decree and grant custody to the other parent. Faced with the proposal of acts constituting parental alienation, the court may order an evaluation to the Social Unit of Family Relations or the licensed professional that it deems necessary, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors or social workers, who will prepare reports and present their findings and recommendations to the court. The court may, if deemed necessary, evaluate the parties or any other evidence it deems pertinent. 

When evidence has been found that one of the parents has committed parental alienation, by the party that has custody of the minors, the court will evaluate the removal from custody or other precautionary measures at the discretion of the judge. If the parental alienation is committed by a relative, stepmother, stepfather or partner of the parent, the court will take measures to protect the minors.

When you are a parent who engages in the conduct of parental alienation, the court will evaluate ordering psychological therapy as a protective measure prior to the decision of removal from custody. In case of ordering psychological therapies, the court will evaluate the progress of this to make new recommendations, if necessary and merit.

Any parent who causes emotional or psychological harm to minors by the behavior of parental alienation, will be ordered to pay for psychological therapies that entail the repair of such harm in minors.

The court will have the discretion to take the measures and issue the orders it deems pertinent at any stage of the process. ”

Section 3.-This Law shall take effect immediately after its approval. 
LAW

To amend Articles 7 and 9 of Law 223-2011, known as the "Law Protecting the Rights of Minors in the Custody Award Process", in order to contemplate the parental alienation in the custody determination; and for other related purposes.

STATEMENT OF MOTIVES

The family is the main protagonist in the upbringing and development of our minors. The family experience modulates and guides children through childhood and towards maturity, it is in the family where we can find explanations for the behavior and conduct of our minors. An adequate emotional and affective bond between parents and children translates into healthy family development for both. Unfortunately during the last decades we have seen changes in the family structure, this due to the increase in divorces or separations. 

After a divorce or separation, as the case may be, and once custody of the sons and / or daughters has been established, the State guarantees the right of both minors and parents to relate and maintain the appropriate family tie. In this way, a regime of visits to the non-custodial parent is established; They have important psychological functions for the development of childhood, in addition to safeguarding the emotional bond between the child and his parents. 

However, and even when the State guarantees the aforementioned right, there are occasions when one of the parties obstructs the filial relations of their sons and daughters with the other parent; in certain cases transforming the conscience of their children, through the use of different strategies, in order to prevent, obstruct or destroy their links with the other parent. 

This behavior, known as Parental Alienation, originates mainly in the context of disputes over the custody and care of children. The effects of parental alienation on minors and the alienated parent are considered a variant of emotional and psychological abuse, being one of the most subtle forms of child maltreatment, which in turn can produce permanent psychological damage in the bond with the parent ( a) alienated; as well as in the integral development of the minors involved. 

Although there is no pattern applicable to all cases, important factors have been identified that alert to its presence. That is why the judicial determination must not be sustained in legal statements without the presence of specialists in human behavior. In most jurisdictions it is seen as a problem to be addressed through civil and non-criminal channels. The criminal process can place you in the uncomfortable situation of testifying to penalize one of your parents. Apart from this, the complexity of the alienating behavior presents a challenge for criminal legislation. We understand that custody determination and its subsequent evaluation in family court must be the most appropriate mechanism to address these situations and provide remedies that tend to advance the emotional health of the minor and strengthen family relationships as much as possible. 

It is the public policy of the Government of Puerto Rico to ensure the best interest, protection, and comprehensive well-being of children and adolescents, and in the duty to ensure that well-being, reasonable opportunities and efforts must be provided to preserve family and community ties when it does not harm them. For this reason, this Legislative Assembly considers it necessary to update the definitions of this statute in order to continue effectively guaranteeing the well-being and protection of children on our island.

DETERMINED BY THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF PUERTO RICO:


Section 1.- A new subsection (13) is added, and the current subsection (13) is renumbered as subsection (14), in Article 7 of Law 223-2011, so that read as follows:

"Article 7.-Criteria to be considered in the custody award

When considering a custody application in which controversies arise between the parents regarding it, the court will refer the case to the Social Relations Unit Family, or the licensed professional that it deems necessary, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors or social workers, who will carry out an evaluation and will give a report with recommendations to the court. , as the court, when issuing its determination, will take into consideration the following criteria:

      ...

(13) It will analyze the presence of parental alienation, or any other reasons that may cause resistance cia of the minor to relate to his parents. Parental alienation refers to the obstruction by one of the parents of the filial relationships of their sons or daughters, minors, with the other parent, through the use of different strategies, with the purpose of transforming or indoctrinating the conscience. of their sons or daughters, in order to denigrate, prevent, obstruct or destroy their ties with the other parent and the minor presents thoughts or feelings of rejection towards the other parent; demonstrates negative attitudes towards this or if, in effect, the affective bond between the minor and the other parent has been affected. All actions arising from this subsection must occur repetitively so that they constitute a pattern and not based on isolated events. 

Parental alienation may be evidenced, without being understood as a limitation, in the following ways: 

(i) Refusing to pass the phone calls or trying to direct the content of such calls to the children. 

(ii) Organize activities with the children during the period that the other parent should normally exercise their right to visit or find ways to hinder the reunion between them. 

(iii) Intercept letters, messages or packages sent to the children. 

(iv) Devaluate and insult the other parent in front of the children.

(v) Refusing to inform the other parent, on purpose, of the activities in which the children are involved, such as school, family, social or other functions. 

(vi) Talk rudely about the new spouse of the other parent.

(vii) Prevent the other parent from exercising their visitation rights. 

(viii) Make important, non-emergency decisions about children without consulting the other parent.

(ix) Change (or try to change) their surnames or first names.

(x) Prevent the other parent from accessing the children's school and medical records.

(xi) Go on vacation without the children and leave them with another person, even if the other parent is available and voluntary to take care of them.


(xii) Discredit the clothes or gifts that the other parent has bought them, and prohibit them from wearing them. 

(xiii) Threatening children with punishment if they dare to call, write or contact the other parent.

(14) Any other valid or pertinent criteria that can be considered to guarantee the best welfare of the minor. ”

Section 2.- Article 9 of Law 223-2011 is amended to read as follows:

“Article 9.-When joint custody will not be considered as beneficial and favorable for the best interests of minors.

Joint custody will not be considered as beneficial and favorable to the best interests of minors in the following cases:

(1) ...

(2) ...

(3) ...

(4) ...

(5 ) ...

(6) ...

(7) ...

(8) ...

If, after granting joint custody, one of the parents, recklessly, arbitrarily and unfairly refuses to accept said decision, and performs acts to hinder the relationship of the other parent with the minors, the court may alter the decree and grant custody to the other parent. Faced with the proposal of acts constituting parental alienation, the court may order an evaluation to the Social Unit of Family Relations or the licensed professional that it deems necessary, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors or social workers, who will prepare reports and present their findings and recommendations to the court. The court may, if deemed necessary, evaluate the parties or any other evidence it deems pertinent. 

When evidence has been found that one of the parents has committed parental alienation, by the party that has custody of the minors, the court will evaluate the removal from custody or other precautionary measures at the discretion of the judge. If the parental alienation is committed by a relative, stepmother, stepfather or partner of the parent, the court will take measures to protect the minors.

When you are a parent who engages in the conduct of parental alienation, the court will evaluate ordering psychological therapy as a protective measure prior to the decision of removal from custody. In case of ordering psychological therapies, the court will evaluate the progress of this to make new recommendations, if necessary and merit.

Any parent who causes emotional or psychological harm to minors by the behavior of parental alienation, will be ordered to pay for psychological therapies that entail the repair of such harm in minors.

The court will have the discretion to take the measures and issue the orders it deems pertinent at any stage of the process. ”

Section 3.-This Law shall take effect immediately after its approval. 

Friday, August 28, 2020

The "Acceptance" Culture & the Lazy Wife

 According to today's morality, "Shaming" is a sin. 

"God loves you for who you are." 

"You are fearfully and wonderfully made."

So therefore, if someone criticizes anything about you that you identify yourself with, saying "you have to change," then that person is toxic, a bully, and abusive. Welcome to the world of "victim consciousnesses."

What if you identify yourself as homosexual, lazy, or any other sins the Bible explicitly calls out?

Uh oh. 

Now the fool will have to choose between which ultimately holds the highest authority. For the individual who ultimately chooses the lies of Satan over the Truth of Scripture, their testimony will go something like this:

All my life, I've harbored this deep secret within me that I was deathly afraid to be discovered about. I was taught that it was wrong. As I grew up, I realized it was something that I could not change. It is who I am. I realized that it was actually everyone else that was wrong. I was tired of being wrong. I was tired of feeling ashamed all the time.

Eventually, I discovered that it wasn't I, who was wrong, but it was everyone else who were bullies and abusers. It wasn't me, but it was the fault of everyone who could not love me for who I am, warts and all.

I found podcasts, YouTube videos, and even Christian articles online that told me that God accepts me for who I am. I no longer need to fight who I am. I can be free. I can LIVE free!

I don't have to be ashamed anymore! In fact, I REFUSE to be feel ashamed or hate myself for WHO I AM!

This narrative is something easy to imagine someone who is homosexual saying that finally gets WOKE and decries the ABUSE they've been receiving as Christians. In Christianity, "shame" is often used in the place of "conscience" and the Holy Spirit which convicts us of our sin.

But, what of a wife that identifies herself as being lazy? How does she see the husband that is always correcting her to maintain checklists around the house and has to constantly correct her?

The wife, identifying as lazy, is naturally also foolish, as Proverbs 26:16, ESV states:

The lazy person thinks he is wiser than seven people who give sensible answers. 

Let's discuss a lazy and foolish wife that finally "stands up for herself" and "stops being a doormat." She increases her defiance against her husband who keeps trying to have her maintain a checklist of tasks to complete in the household. She says to herself with indignation:

How dare he force me to maintain a checklist! I'm not his employee! I'm his wife! He needs to love me for who I am. I am not perfect. So, I'm a little lazy and I forget things. So what?! All my girlfriends don't have to maintain checklists. I'm tired of being wrong! And finally, I found some pastors, podcasts, and websites that tell me that my husband getting angry and yelling at me because I'm lazy and don't maintain checklists is ABUSIVE!

And when I try to stand up for myself and tell him that I don't have to take his abuse anymore, he tries to tell me that I'm still wrong! He thinks his requests are reasonable. Well, they aren't. They are demeaning. And I'm not going to take it anymore.

I have felt so much shame because I don't "live up to his standards" over the years we've been married. I have prayed to God that he would change me for so long and I never change. I have finally accepted myself. I AM Lazy. That's how God made me and God accepts me for who I am. My husband should just accept who I am. I simply cannot tolerate living in a marriage with a man who will keep abusing me my entire life for WHO I AM. I finally found the courage to say, "NO MORE!"

To quote the prophet, Milo Yiannopoulos: "Feminism is cancer."

Thursday, August 27, 2020

The credibility of QAnon just went up

Many churchians don't want you listening to QAnon:

Some Christian leaders, including a couple of prominent conservative evangelicals, have denounced the conspiracy theory movement gaining traction in conservative circles known as QAnon.

Their own words condemn themselves.

“The QAnon movement frequently engages in slander, which James calls demonic behavior (James 3:15–16). The QAnon movement often traffics in lies, which Jesus says are associated with Satan. The QAnon movement repeatedly sides with demonically inspired falsehoods that divide professed Christians from faithful believers,” wrote Carter.

“And the QAnon movement has a tendency to call evil that which is good, and good that which is evil, and to put darkness for light, and light for darkness (Isa. 5:20). As movement of Satan, QAnon is incompatible with Christianity.” 

Inversion. 

SJWs always project.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

17 Year Old Bravery

I can only hope that when my sons and daughters are 17 years old that they have the courage to strap on an AR-15 in defense of their community like the 17 year old man in Kenosha that shot at least three in self defense.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8665383/One-shot-dead-two-wounded-BLM-protesters-defy-curfew-Kenosha.html


Of course, if it's in my children's case, and should my homestead / compound complex be completed in time for 2033, it will be:

  1. completely clear sight-lines of 400 yards to my property line
  2. triple steel wire barrier to prevent vehicle attacks
  3. a chain link fence with barbed wire on top
  4. four German shepherds 
  5. a concrete house / bastion
  6. a concrete observation tower about 35 feet up
  7. thermal / night vision scopes
I will be surprised if they even make it within 200 yards inside my property.

If for whatever reason we have to be mobile, us farm boys and our ATVs will probably roll in squads of 6, and 3 ATVs like this.




Los Angeles County Temporary Eviction Moratorium Includes COMMERCIAL

WHAT IS THE L.A. COUNTY TEMPORARY EVICTION MORATORIUM?

The Los Angeles County Temporary Eviction Moratorium, effective March 4, 2020 to September 30, 2020, implements a Countywide ban on evictions for residential and commercial tenants, including mobile home space renters. During the moratorium, tenants may not be evicted for COVID 19 related non-payment of rent, as well as no fault reasons, nuisance, unauthorized occupants or pets, if related to COVID-19. The moratorium may be extended by the L.A. County Board of Supervisors on a month-to-month basis. 

Source: https://dcba.lacounty.gov/noevictions/

Now there are numerous conditions associated for it to apply, but foolish is the Landlord who tries to test the willingness of a Judge to demonstrate leeway and award attorney fees to the "victimized," deadbeat tenant.

Los Angeles County is quite a large county, and I'm surprised that I could not find anything on Zero Hedge about this.

Los Angeles County probably is not the only county or city that has placed moratoriums like this.

That means there is a much larger avalanche of foreclosures and defaults waiting in the pipeline once these moratoriums lift.

Apostle Paul Sins Against the Church of Nice

For all their talk about believing in Scripture as the Word of God and their strict adherence to the qualifications of Elders, Churchians always tend to forget the paragraph subsequent that violates their Rules of "Nice." See Titus 1:5-9, ESV:

This is why I left you in Crete, so that you might put what remained into order, and appoint elders in every town as I directed you— if anyone is above reproach, the husband of one wife,d and his children are believers and not open to the charge of debauchery or insubordination. For an overseer, as God’s steward, must be above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined. He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.

And now the subsequent paragraph which gets ignored:

For there are many who are insubordinate, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision party. They must be silenced, since they are upsetting whole families by teaching for shameful gain what they ought not to teach. One of the Cretans,i a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith, not devoting themselves to Jewish myths and the commands of people who turn away from the truth. To the pure, all things are pure, but to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure; but both their minds and their consciences are defiled. They profess to know God, but they deny him by their works. They are detestable, disobedient, unfit for any good work.

Can you tell from which author in the Bible has inspired my writing style?

Also, why is Apostle Paul generalizing about all the people on an island? How racist.

Friday, August 21, 2020

Winter is Coming

UPDATE (9/3/2020): My figures are wrong. See https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/30/most-common-age-among-us-racial-ethnic-groups/ and https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2016/04/20/the-nations-latino-population-is-defined-by-its-youth/


As inevitable as the seasons and hurricanes to Puerto Rico, the 2033 deadline of the collapse of the American empire comes closer. Since the average age of Hispanics is 7 years old, the only real way to stop the inevitable is to deport the children of immigrants, even if they were born in the United States.

In 11 years, the average 7 year old Hispanic will become voting age, and bring in the undying legacy of Leftism. The Left will never (as Vox Day states) voluntarily leave the host as they are intrinsically parasites.

As a result, once the demographic realities of the mass invasion complete the takeover of the Federal Government, States that still have a white majority, will be faced to nullify akin to what occurred during Andrew Jackson's day and what the South attempted to do against Abraham Lincoln.

Will the Leftist President allow their money train to simply walk away?

I'm not optimistic about that.

Understanding just how inevitable and soon this is coming has brought focus toward my endeavors.

It also saves a lot of time trying to "persuade" anyone or to really care about politics until 2033. What's the point? It will be impossible for me to persuade anyone to start deporting the American-born children of immigrants. It's insane. 

In fact, I would be included in that pool. That would be a complete mess for my children who are bi-racial, but I'm sure my ex-wife would love it as long as she can keep the kids and her monthly payment from me. Maybe I would get an exemption because I'm an Air Force officer (commissions are lifetime. You're welcome.).

Thanks to Game of Thrones, it's easy enough for me to say "Winter is Coming." 

Thanks to Hurricane Maria & Puerto Rico, I've already lived through one week of Armageddon.

When a hurricane is heading toward Puerto Rico, I don't bother wasting time trying to "convince" someone to start preparing for the destruction. If they want to stick their head in the sand, that's their problem. Not mine. 

If they want to declare it is racist, misogynist, sexist, fear-mongering, conspiracy-theory, that the hurricane is coming, then that gives me the cue to wipe the dust off my feet and move on.

Let the dead bury the dead.

Feminism, Immigration, and the Hospitality Industry

Vox Day makes the accurate observation that the price of labor has remained flat for about the last 50 years (since 1973):

But since some of you can't follow anything that isn't spelled out pedantically, in the interest of strict accuracy I should have written that "Lower wages are the inevitable consequence of the higher percentage of women entering the workforce, mass immigration, and trade deficits, which are three of the primary reasons your society is collapsing."

I was the benefactor of both Feminism and mass immigration in the form of the housekeepers that made up the majority of my staff. Also, the front desk staff, and probably the majority of every other department except the maintenance staff.

The housekeepers I employed were overwhelmingly Mexican immigrants who could not speak English very well and were women making about minimum wage in California, which was always higher than the Federal average (heading toward $15/hour).

I did try hiring white men and women who could speak English fluently in the housekeeping department. They never lasted very long. To them, it was a transitory job until they found a better job, which was not hard for them to do.

I had no interest in paying higher wages to keep the white kids because I always had referrals from the Mexican women who needed jobs.

If there were no Mexican women to work in my hotel, I would had been forced to pay higher wages to keep the white kids.

On a side note, I was fairly familiar with the various neighborhoods in North Orange County and the pushing out of white families by Koreans. Thanks to a program called "Mello-Roos," local HOAs could basically open their own school that services only the children.

There is a small HOA called, "Amerige Heights" that had very public school scores and was overwhelmingly Korean. The rents were extremely high and home pricing as well because the Korean immigrants would want to send their children there.

If you know about Korean immigrants and their love for private tutoring, and educational rigor, you can understand why this would be natural.

Obviously, the mass immigration of Koreans push out the whites in price point. The restaurants in that section basically look like Korea-town with store signs all in Korean providing services all over the place.

They don't assimilate. They create enclaves and push out the natives. They don't need to assimilate, and many don't even bother learning English.

The last two hotels I sold were purchased with Chinese immigrant money at prices that would had been dumb for me to refuse. Due to the high labor requirements, it is easy to get an EB-5 with hotel purchases.

When I went looking for the next properties to purchase with the newfound Chinese wealth, we obviously couldn't compete (nor suicidal enough) to go back into hotels. So we went into Shopping Centers. With Coronavirus, I wish I looked more seriously into industrial and warehouse space in light of Coronavirus.

The home I purchased in 2010 for about $430,000 in Placentia, CA, I sold around 2017 for $572,000. My house was in about a 90% Mexican neighborhood, single family homes, with an acceptable elementary school, but higher level middle and high school thanks to the wider radius in the white neighborhoods.

It is more common to see Mexican children enter Kindergarten with minimal abilities to speak English. The pressure from their home to learn it, is not as strong as you see in Koreans. Korean children tend to get much higher school scores. The Mexican children tend to lower it. 

What this meant was that the pricing of a house in Orange County, was largely determinate based on the racial makeup of the public schools that service the address. The schools with higher number of Koreans always brought the highest price. I don't think this applied as strongly with majority Chinese neighborhoods for some reason.

Thanks to mass immigration (greater demand) and limited inventory, my home increased 33% over about seven years.

The profit was even more insane with the Chinese money.

On a micro level, I never discriminate. A deal is a deal. On a macro level, I have seen the higher cost of real estate, and stagnant wages destroying the native population thanks to Feminism and mass immigration.

It is completely unsustainable, and the largest, recorded invasion in all of human-kind will come to the dissolution of the United States in 2033 as Vox Day predicts. I was lucky enough to be able to profit from the disastrous policies, and now I prepare a bastion against the negative consequences that will be a result.

There will be war.

Friday, August 14, 2020

7-Year-Old Transgender Dispute Lies

There is something very fishy about the entire situation with the 7-year old child, James Young, and his father, Jeffrey Young, trying to prevent his now, ex-wife Anne Georgulas from giving James Young puberty blockers.

There are plenty of articles on this issue filled with outrage. This particular case was especially hard hitting to me because I am in a custody battle with my children with my ex-wife. I believed the testimony of the father.

Unfortunately, what they leave out is just how prolific of a liar that the supposed "protecting"father is. This can be seen in the court documents of his divorce papers with Anne Georgulas: https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2018/05-16-01412-cv.html

Just read it. 

Does he seem like a person who would give credible testimony? Don't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth.

The lies of Jeffrey Young to trick Ms. Georgulas to marry him and bear his children are astounding.

Remember that the Bible sees providing false witness akin to murder. They are often mentioned in the same sentence. Wicked. 1 Corinthians 9 states:

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Jeffrey swindled his ex-wife into marriage and the two children. If Jeffrey is lying about what James is telling him, then Jeffrey is reviling his wife.

A jury ruled in favor of giving the mother full custody rights 11 to 1.

I don't trust a word that James Young says.

Let's assume that the father is a complete liar, and that the 7-year old James states he wants to become a girl. Let the boy dress up as a girl. Puberty blockers will inevitably cause irreversible damage to the child should the child change his mind in the future.

Fubar indeed.

Considering how much of a liar their father is, there is no "God" angle in this. The kids will grow up hating their father anyway for being such a liar.

Neither parents care about what the Bible says.

This is not a battle between "God" and the "Devil" as it is being portrayed. God is not represented in this battle.

Saturday, August 8, 2020

Even the liars admit we do not wrestle against flesh and blood

I was raised in Seattle and through my public education came to the conclusion that there was nothing really "forbidden" for me to watch or read. It was all mental. I scoffed at age restrictions toward what movies I could not watch and any video games which I could not as well. My parents were completely clueless about American society being immigrants from war-torn Korea.

This was before Internet really blew up. Pornography was through dial-up where someone in the house picking up the phone would interrupt my 1v1 versus my friend in Wacraft II.

I recall the SNL skits of the "Church Lady" played by Dana Carvey who would frequently come to the conclusion that something was from "Satan." The Satanic Panic was around this time. The Christian Right was attacked for its attempts to try and censor "immoral" media. I watched Wayne's World obsessively whose plot revolved around Wayne being censored for his comedy where he ultimately was fired.

I was indoctrinated on the side of the Liberal Media machine that mocked the Religious Right against their view of "spiritual warfare," media being from Satan, and their attempts to censor to protect the children.

Today, now that the Liberal Media no longer has the monopoly it once had on information, and they are being exposed for the liars that they are, it is amazing how quickly they have become hypocrites and become pro-censorship. The main reason being that they now publicly acknowledge that it is an information war. It is a war between truth and lies.

QAnon Is Running Amok, and the Time Has Come for Interventions

Memes emanating from the conspiracy group—which are tenuously united in the discredited belief that there’s a plot to oust Trump from the presidency—have made their way into the social media accounts of everyone from Michael Flynn (who was briefly national security adviser) to White House social media adviser Dan Scavino. Sometimes these memes can be as innocent as an image featuring Trump with a...

Memes. Memetic warfare. The war between God and the Devil is being played out in front of our face real time in memes. Hearts and minds. 

For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

By what venue are the lies spread? Who is the Father of Lies?

Looks like the Church Lady was right. 

Thursday, August 6, 2020

Two "Survivalist" Movies - The Road & Threads

THE ROAD
The movie seems like the hopelessness of a father who wasn't prepped for a major disaster. First, he only has a revolver. Second, he only has, what looks like, two .22 LR bullets in his revolver. It does seem as though the mother gives birth to the boy after the incident occurred. The boy seems to be at least 8 years old, so in that case, if they were able to survive for 8 years, I have to give him credit for that. To survive that long without what looked like a lot of supplies, that's pretty impressive.

THREADS (1984)
I didn't know what to expect. It pretty much didn't hold back on showing the ugliness of a post-nuclear city. Perhaps the only thing it left out was cannibalism, but pretty much every other horror was depicted.

Whatever you do, don't live within shock wave distance to a major or strategic city.


What Happens To Your Uninsured FDIC Money When A Bank Gets Taken Over?

In the case of IndyMac, they got 50% of their money back. That is fortunate compared to what others got:
Each bank failure is unique, he added, For instance, customers of A&B Financial in Arkansas received 25 percent of their uninsured money from the FDIC; in Nevada, customers of Silver State Bank recouped just 11 percent of their uninsured funds.
I operated under the wrong assumption that no one lost money during the closures because of the kind of panic it would cause. Now I know better and have to do some adjustments. 

Note that opening multiple bank accounts at the same bank won't necessarily help.

Maybe just finding a bank "Too Big To Fail" will help. But even that is no guarantee if the losses are too much. 

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Puerto Rican Banks and the Texas Ratio

I don't know how the banks in Puerto Rico manage to make profits considering the volume of Nonperforming assets on their books. There may also be a reason why pretty much all major US banks do not have a branch in Puerto Rico. 

I think PenFed is the only bank I know of that has banks in both the mainland and Puerto Rico.

As of 2020 Quarter 2, they are as follows:

First Bank - 30.10

To put this in perspective, the average across all banks is currently 7.11. We'll most likely see that number increase drastically since people probably stopped paying their May payment. Give it until Q3 and Q4 to see the 90 day delinquencies show up as Non-Performing Assets.

Bank v. Peers · Current Quarter Yearly


Rest of Nation · All OTHER Banks · Current Quarter Yearly



When you look at the Puerto Rico banks' past ratios, it gets extremely high. FirstBank, for example, had numbers above 100 which means they had more Nonperforming Assets in volume than their Tangible Equity + Loan Loss Reserves. IndyMac collapsed at around 140 or 112 depending on how you calculate the ratio.

The three Puerto Rico banks I mentioned TODAY have Texas Ratios that are at or above the average of all banks, at the worst of their defaults in 2010, 30.61.

Due to FDIC Insurance, I don't think I have any risk of losing the money completely, but should the banks go under receivership, it could cause the funds to be inaccessible for months while the bank transitions to new ownership. Sometimes it's smooth. Other times, it will be months. Because it's Puerto Rico, consider it to NOT be smooth, and for it to take double or triple what it would take Stateside.

Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Puerto Rico's Tax Haven Will Disappear Soon Anyway

In Pat Buchanan's latest article, he states the obvious once Democrats effectively end the filibuster:
After abolishing the filibuster, says Obama, Democrats should ram through statehood for Puerto Rico and D.C., thereby expanding the Senate to 104 members, and adding four new Democratic senators. That new Senate, says Obama, should enact every law possible to enlarge and expand the electorate, including extending the ballot to ex-convicts.
The filibuster is a relic of racism, so we know Republicans will eventually cave in to prove that they aren't the REAL racists.

Once Puerto Rico gains statehood, the low tax incentives known as Act 60/22/20 will no longer apply as Puerto Rico will be subject to Federal Income taxes.

Purely conjecture, after the Democratic President gets reelected after Trump, they can use their newfound "mandate" to push their agenda 8 to 12 years from now after whatever residual courage demonstrated by Trump completely evaporates and the Cuckservatives continue their cuck ways.

This all happens to fall into the 2033 timing of Vox Day of the disintegration of the United States.

I hope to be long gone and better strategically situated long before then.

If you want to see an obvious "milestone" of the end of the US Empire, the filibuster will be one of them. But I see the end of the filibuster as only being a symptom of the greater demographic vulnerabilities. The end of the filibuster will only speed up an already declining, and conquered empire.